Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Appointments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Scottsdale council names members to multiple advisory boards and commissions
Summary
At a March 18 meeting, Scottsdale City Council interviewed nominees and appointed residents to advisory boards and commissions including the Airport Advisory Commission, Building Advisory Board of Appeals, Citizens Bond Oversight Committee and several others.
Get email alerts on the Appointments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Scottsdale City Council on March 18 completed interviews and confirmed appointments to a range of volunteer advisory boards and commissions, filling vacancies across airport, building, bond oversight, environmental, human relations, judicial and parks panels.
The council conducted short on‑the‑record interviews with nominees who described their residence, professional backgrounds and priorities for the boards. Vice Mayor Jan DeBoskis and council members led the process and then took votes by roll call or affirmation for each body. Appointments included Thomas Kubey to the Airport Advisory Commission; Quentin Augsperger and Frederick Detman to the Building Advisory Board of Appeals (appointed by affirmation); James Davis to the Citizens Bond Oversight Committee; Judah Waxelbaum to the Environmental Advisory Commission (and John Cressi received votes in that contest); Mason Gates and Sherry Sapir to the Human Relations Commission; Jeannie Beasley to the Judicial Appointments Advisory Board; Jacob Seltzer reappointed to the Lost Trust Fund Board; Kim Barris and David Creed to the Neighborhood Advisory Commission; and Jamie Alford to the Parks and Recreation Commission.
Nominees emphasized varied priorities. Airport commission candidates stressed safety, training school regulation and master‑plan updates. Building appeals nominees highlighted code familiarity and a proposed residential safety amendment (requiring accessible return‑air filter locations). Bond oversight candidates raised cost escalation and schedule oversight as top concerns. Environmental and sustainability nominees urged conservation measures such as water‑saving fixtures and civic carport opportunities. Human relations nominees emphasized inclusivity and outreach; judicial board nominees cited the importance of public confidence in judicial appointments.
Council members repeatedly thanked applicants and noted that applications not appointed would remain on file for future vacancies. Several council members praised the depth of applicants’ experience and urged continued public involvement in commission work.
Ending The council concluded the appointment portion of the March 18 special meeting after filling the listed vacancies and thanked all nominees for volunteering. Many nominees indicated willingness to serve on future openings if not appointed this cycle.

