Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Code Update topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council Postpones Broad Rewrite of Public‑health, Sanitation and Animal Code for More Review
Summary
Council postponed a comprehensive rewrite of chapter 7 (public health, sanitation and animals) to the April 15 meeting after staff outlined substantive changes — including switching to an allowed‑animals list, revised noise rules, and solid‑waste amendments — and asked for additional direction on reptiles and other specifics.
The Common Council voted to postpone consideration of a comprehensive update to the city’s public‑health, sanitation and animals code until April 15, after the city attorney and department staff summarized substantive revisions and requested more time for council guidance.
City Attorney Cale Decker told the committee and council that the proposed rewrite simplifies wording and makes several substantive changes. Key elements reviewed by staff include: - Animals: the draft shifts from attempting to ban listed animals to a positive list model — “all wild and domestic animals are banned except those that are explicitly allowed.” The current allowed list includes dogs, cats, certain small mammals, fish, certain amphibians and parrots/cockatiels; the council asked staff for direction on reptiles (snakes, turtles) and whether to allow any reptiles at all. A “fanciers permit” would remain available to allow otherwise prohibited animals after case‑by‑case review and conditions. - Domestic‑animal limits: the draft initially proposed an overall two‑animal limit; staff said the next version will revert to the existing approach that limits numbers by species (dogs and cats) rather than a blanket cap, and will preserve the fanciers permit for exceptions. - Human waste and enforcement: the 24‑hour rule for animal feces was proposed to change to a requirement that owners “remove promptly,” which staff said makes enforcement possible on nuisance complaints instead of forcing a 24‑hour waiting period. - Noise and vibration: the proposal would move away from strictly decibel‑meter enforcement to distance/audibility standards (75 feet at night; 50 feet during the day), allowing enforcement by police and health staff without specialized equipment while preserving reasonable exceptions for property maintenance activities. - Solid waste: the rewrite eliminates a fixed 75‑pound limit on city receptacles in favor of a maneuverability standard and proposes standards for bulk pickup (no more than three rigid objects per pickup, with some options to place containers for collection). Staff also proposed simplifying the fee collection process for bulk pickups: notices, 30‑day appeal to the Administrative Review Board, then special charge on the tax bill if not appealed.
Decker and staff emphasized that the draft contains additional deletions of sections that duplicate state law and that the rewrite sought to make the code both clearer and enforceable. Council members asked for clarifications about reptiles — council members debated whether any snakes should be allowed — and requested that specific provisions such as the existing prohibition on dogs at Rogers Playground be restored if desired.
Why it matters: the rewrite touches many everyday enforcement and permitting issues (noise, animal ownership, trash and rodents) and would change enforcement standards and permit types. Council members and staff agreed more time was necessary to settle contentious or detailed items before adoption.
Ending: Council voted to postpone the ordinance until April 15 and directed staff to circulate a revised draft that addresses the questions raised, particularly on reptiles, dog limits and any park‑specific prohibitions.
Speakers quoted: Cale Decker (City Attorney); public works and health staff participated in committee discussion.
