Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solid Waste topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Burke County explores reopening/expanding landfill footprint and other options to cut disposal costs
Summary
Staff reported that transitioning to in‑house transport cut tipping costs this year and proposed a multi‑year study of whether a county‑operated municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill on county property is feasible; board agreed to explore the option further.
Get email alerts on the Solid Waste topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Burke County staff asked commissioners to consider further study of a county‑operated municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill after staff reported significant near‑term savings from changes implemented this year and described a multi‑year path to permitting and building a lined MSW cell.
Solid waste staff (Mr. Sandow) said county restructuring of curbside and convenience‑site handling and a decision to transport MSW to Republic Services’ Lenoir landfill in‑house saved the county roughly $1,080,000 in the current fiscal year. The change required leasing vehicles, hiring operational staff and some up‑front costs estimated at about $250,000, but staff negotiated approximately $20 per ton lower tipping fees with Republic and implemented compaction of cardboard at convenience sites to reduce contracted hauling costs.
Why it matters: About one‑third of the solid‑waste enterprise fund’s operating costs are disposal/tipping fees; staff told commissioners that owning and operating an MSW landfill would be capital‑intensive but could save tens of millions of dollars over decades and would reduce the county’s exposure to outside landfill rate increases.
Technical overview and timeline: County engineering consultant Vance Moore explained that converting the existing Johns River site (where the county already operates a C&D landfill and transfer station) into MSW capacity would require significant permitting, environmental due diligence, cemetery relocation work in one portion of the site and construction of lined landfill cells with leachate collection and gas management. Moore outlined a staged process: a near‑term “fatal‑flaw” study (to assess streams, cemetery relocation feasibility, buffers and other constraints), followed by detailed permitting, design and then phased construction. Staff estimated that if the county pursued a new MSW footprint and moved forward without delay, opening a county MSW landfill would be several years away (staff mentioned 2029–2030 as an earliest plausible opening) and that an MSW landfill sized to current local tonnage could have a 35–40 year life; staff estimated lifecycle disposal savings in the tens of millions of dollars compared with continued reliance on contract disposal.
Budget and enterprise fund context: The solid‑waste enterprise fund ran a small operating surplus for the first time this year after the operational changes; staff emphasized the need to set aside reserves for capital replacements and for landfill post‑closure monitoring (the county carries an actuarial liability for closed landfills). The board heard that earlier landfills (East Burke, Kirksey Drive) are closed but remain subject to monitoring and that that post‑closure care and gas/groundwater monitoring are long‑term obligations.
Board direction: Commissioners agreed by consensus to direct staff to proceed with next‑step exploratory work — a targeted fatal‑flaw study and permitting assessment for additional MSW capacity at the Johns River site (or an alternate county site if fatal flaws are identified). Staff estimated a modest study budget for the coming fiscal year to test feasibility and return to the board with a clear go/no‑go recommendation; any construction would require subsequent multi‑year funding and permitting steps. No vote to build a landfill or to commit capital was taken at the meeting.

