Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Northstar Transit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sherburne County staff warn Met Council intends to end Northstar service; county to review investments and seek talks
Summary
County officials said the Met Council and MnDOT appear intent on terminating Northstar commuter rail; staff will compile a history of county investments and coordinate with nearby cities to seek discussions about reimbursement and future service options.
Sherburne County officials said a regional transit review could end Northstar commuter rail and leave the county without direct rail stops.
Administrator Messelt told the Board the county and its staff spoke with the Met Council and Minnesota Department of Transportation and were told the agencies are "intent on terminating Northstar," with a timeline likely measured in months rather than years. Messelt said the agencies indicated any future transit serving areas outside the seven‑county Twin Cities metro would not be funded or managed by the Met Council.
The prospect, if realized, could remove train stops currently serving Sherburne County communities and shift any future commuter service to bus options that may stop only at Anoka or another transfer point, Messelt said. "It is very clear that the Met Council's position is any future transit service outside of the 7 county Metro Region will not be funded or administered or managed by the Met Council," he said.
Commissioners expressed frustration at what several called limited prior notice and said the county has millions invested in Northstar infrastructure dating to earlier planning. Board members asked staff to assemble a packet documenting the county's historical investments, ridership trends and any contractual claims that could arise if service is suspended or assets are written off. Staff also said it will coordinate with the cities of Big Lake and Elk River and Anoka County to determine next steps and to request meetings with state and Met Council leaders if the board wants to pursue that avenue.
County staff and commissioners debated the merits of continuing to press for preservation of rail service versus evaluating alternative uses and not pursuing further subsidized rail if ridership no longer justifies it. Staff noted ridership numbers have declined in recent reports and that future options could include bus rapid transit or other service models, though the county may be excluded from Met Council‑led planning.
No formal board vote was recorded on a policy decision; commissioners directed staff to compile the investment history, evaluate possible claims or reimbursement, and return with a recommended approach for board consideration.
