Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning And Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Farragut board adopts resolution backing chapter 4 of mixed‑use town center vision plan
Summary
The Farragut Board of Mayor and Aldermen on March 13 approved Resolution R2025‑06, a nonbinding expression of support for chapter 4 (recommendations) of the town’s mixed‑use town center vision plan, following staff presentations and prior public outreach.
The Town of Farragut Board of Mayor and Aldermen voted 4‑to‑1 on March 13 to approve Resolution R2025‑06, a resolution expressing support for chapter 4 — the recommendations chapter — of the Mixed Use Town Center Vision Plan.
The resolution, presented by Mark Shipley (staff member), formalizes the town’s endorsement of the vision plan’s recommendations while making clear the plan is advisory, not regulatory. "These are really concepts that help guide decision making," Shipley said, adding that the chapter summarizes community priorities gathered through workshops and surveys.
The resolution’s approval follows nearly a year of public outreach: a steering committee, four community workshops and two surveys that drew more than 1,200 responses, Shipley told the board. The planning commission reviewed earlier drafts, asked for edits (including replacing a specific proposed roundabout with more generic “intersection improvement” language), and unanimously recommended approval of the planning commission resolution PC‑24‑19 that corresponds to the board’s item.
Board discussion was brief. Alderman Autumn McCain asked why the board was voting on the plan after it was drafted; Shipley replied, "Well, it's just an expression of support if you want to do that." Alderman White cast the lone dissenting vote. Vice Mayor Meyer, Alderman Burnette and Alderman Kane voted in favor; Mayor Ron Williams also voted yes.
By adopting R2025‑06, the board signaled support for the plan’s recommended concepts while reserving the authority to use ordinances or other regulations if it later chooses to implement specific recommendations. Shipley and the town attorney framed the measure as guidance: "This is a vision plan — not an ordinance," Shipley said.
Background: staff noted the town previously considered adopting parts of the plan by ordinance but opted for a resolution after public concern that ordinance language could be read as mandatory. The town’s planning commission had reviewed and revised the draft through several workshops in 2024 before forwarding it to the board.
The board took the vote by roll call; the resolution passed at approximately 6:31 p.m. on March 13, 2025.
