Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Fire Apparatus Maintenance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Hinsdale reviews first read of three-year maintenance agreement with Lisle Woodridge Fire District for heavy apparatus

2688215 · March 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Trustees reviewed a proposed intergovernmental agreement for Lisle Woodridge Fire District to provide maintenance and repairs on Hinsdale's heavy fire apparatus; staff said the district has certified emergency vehicle technicians and the rate would be $125 per hour.

The Village of Hinsdale Board of Trustees held a first reading on an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with the Lisle Woodridge Fire District to perform maintenance and repairs on Hinsdale’s fire apparatus.

Village staff explained the village currently lacks an emergency vehicle technician on staff and relies on a limited pool of certified vendors. The village typically sends heavy repairs to WERF Industries in McHenry County, which staff said requires about 1 hour and 15 minutes of travel time, increasing vehicle downtime.

Under the proposed three-year IGA, Lisle Woodridge — which staff said employs several certified emergency vehicle technicians and already provides full maintenance for its own fleet and the Darien Woodridge Fire District — would provide maintenance for Hinsdale’s fleet at a rate of $125 per hour. The IGA would allow either party to terminate with 45 days’ notice.

Why it matters: Staff said the agreement would reduce travel time, shorten equipment downtime, and consolidate service records that are important for heavy apparatus maintenance. The village also noted 2024 vendor rates for similar work averaged about $140 per hour; because maintenance needs vary year to year, staff said the budget impact cannot be precisely stated today.

Trustee comments: Trustees responded positively, with members calling the arrangement a "win-win" and a practical solution to limited local capacity. No formal action was taken at the first read; staff indicated the item will proceed to further review and, if ready, to a future consent agenda or action item.

Next steps: The IGA will be reviewed by staff and counsel; trustees did not object to placing the item on a future consent agenda pending final review.