Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Traffic Fines topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Defendant in Municipal Court of Providence says financial hardship led to unpaid traffic fines
Summary
At a brief hearing in the Municipal Court of Providence, a defendant told a presiding judge he did not pay traffic tickets because he was broke; the judge questioned whether the money drivers make delivering pizzas offsets fines incurred while driving aggressively.
At a brief hearing in the Municipal Court of Providence, a defendant told the presiding judge he had not paid traffic tickets because he was “broke,” and asked the court for leniency.
The exchange highlighted the gap between the value of some consumer purchases and the fines drivers face. The judge contrasted a $20 pizza delivery with an $85 fine and questioned the defendant about risky driving to make on-time deliveries.
During the colloquy, the presiding judge said, “You went through about 15 red lights to get the pizza there on time,” and later summarized the financial point: “So, you deliver a $20 pizza and you're paying $85 for a fine. The math doesn't make sense.” The defendant told the court he had “6 years of pizza delivery” experience and explained, “I didn't pay the tickets on time because, because you were broke. It wasn't at the top of my list of things to pay, and I didn't have the money.”
The defendant listed basic expenses when asked what bills he had: “Food, rent,” and “Clothes.” At one point the defendant asked the judge to “give him a break, Judge,” an appeal to reduce or reconsider penalties that appears in the transcript as part of the plea for leniency.
The transcript does not record a formal ruling, a payment plan, or any sentence. No motions, fines adjustments, or follow-up dates are stated in the excerpt provided.
