Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisors uphold zoning commission and deny rezoning request for data-mining use
Summary
Jackson County supervisors accepted the zoning commission's recommendation to keep a contested parcel in A-1 (agricultural) zoning and deny a rezone to M-1 for a proposed data-mining/mining operation; the board discussed possible moratorium and noted an ordinance placeholder for the use-type in a rewrite.
The Jackson County Board of Supervisors on March 18 accepted the zoning commission's unanimous recommendation (with one abstention at the commission) to deny a requested rezoning to M-1 for case 25-01 and retain the parcel in A-1 agricultural zoning.
Laurie (representing county zoning staff/commission updates) told the board the commission had revisited a case that had been tabled in February. The commission determined the proposed use best matched an M-1 designation but concluded that the parcel north of Spragueville was not a suitable location to be rezoned to M-1 and therefore recommended denial. Supervisor Mike moved to approve the zoning commission recommendation and the board passed the motion on voice vote.
Public comment included a resident, Randy Rowan, who attended the zoning hearing and said he supported the commission decision. Rowan suggested the county consider future ordinance language to set minimum distances between residential structures and operations such as the data-mining facilities discussed; he suggested distances ranging from 1,500 feet up to a half mile to reduce noise impacts.
Board and zoning staff discussed options going forward. Suggestions included asking the zoning commission to return recommendations with stricter parameters (setbacks, fire suppression, noise or building/foundation requirements) or imposing a moratorium to allow the county to finalize ordinance language. Zoning staff noted a placeholder for data-mining-type operations already exists in the draft ordinance rewrite; supervisors suggested waiting for the current legislative session to conclude before taking formal county-level changes.
Why it matters: the decision prevents a rezone that would permit a mining/data-mining operation under M-1 at the contested site and signals the county will continue to require review through its special-exception and zoning-commission process until specific ordinance language and any potential moratorium is considered.
