Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Omaha City Council roundup: liquor licenses, plats and routine measures approved; a few items laid over
Summary
Council approved multiple liquor licenses, plats and zoning requests, passed personnel and contract extensions, dismissed a statutory liquor complaint, and laid over a contested convenience-store liquor application for one week to allow neighborhood negotiation.
Get email alerts on the Council Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Omaha City Council’s March 18 meeting included a mix of routine approvals, contested hearings, and follow-up actions. Major outcomes included approvals of several liquor licenses, multiple land-use plats and rezones, adoption of personnel and contract extensions, a statutory hearing dismissal, and one high-profile layover. Key items and votes are summarized below.
Liquor licenses and related votes - Terra Gaucha Brazilian Steakhouse (Class C, 13851 First National Bank Pkwy): Approved, roll call 7–0. - No Good (Class I, 3528 Center St., brunch/bagel concept): Approved, roll call 7–0. - Thai Kitchen (Class II, 16909 Lakeside Hills Plaza): Approved, roll call 7–0. - Cantina Sol transfer (Don Gabby’s Sports Bar Class C transfer to 1919 Missouri Ave.): Approved, roll call 7–0. - Warhorse Casino (liquor-license addition for expansion at 6303 Q St.): Amendment to describe revised floor areas adopted 7–0; final approval as amended 7–0. - Y Family Convenience Store (Class D, 7102 N. 30th St.): Council laid the item over one week to allow negotiations between the applicant and neighborhood (vote to lay over passed 6–1). A prior motion to deny was made and later withdrawn.
Land-use and plats (selected) - Schouler Replat (prelim & final plat; tied to special-use permit for recycling/crushing): Approved 6–1. (See article on dust and enforcement.) - South Farm Replat 3 (prelim plat): Approved 7–0. - McArdle Ridge, Sunrise, Bluestem Prairie, Mason Place Rose, Ridge/Harrison, Bedford Heights and multiple subdivision approvals and related rezones: All received planning-board recommendations and were approved by the council (many votes 7–0; see minutes for each item). - Elmington Subdivision (293-unit LIHTC apartments; rezoning, PUD overlay, plats and subdivision agreement): Approved 6–1 (Councilmember Johnson voted no). (See separate article on the Elmington controversy.)
Statutory and enforcement items - Complaint under Neb. Rev. Stat. 53-134.04 against Pacific Convenience Mart: Dismissed by the council, 7–0, after testimony from neighboring property owners and the store’s representatives. Council urged both sides to cooperate and asked city staff and homeless-services teams to follow up.
Contracts, personnel and administrative matters - Multi-year contract extensions with FCC Environmental Services for yard-waste collection and recycling-drop processing: Council approved five-year extensions. - Multiple personnel-classification adjustments (HVAC technician, librarian pay, mechanical inspector pay ranges, police/fire labor agreements): Council approved recommended changes from the personnel board. - Miscellaneous procurement ordinances (e.g., sludge-dewatering polymer purchase, other public-works items) proceeded on consent or by single vote with staff present to answer questions.
Process notes and next steps - The council repeatedly encouraged neighbors and applicants in contested hearings to meet outside the chamber to attempt negotiated solutions before final recommendations or appeals to state agencies. - Where council approved plats or rezones tied to permits (for example the Schouler replat), staff noted final issuance of permits is contingent on completion of outstanding conditions such as air-quality approvals and specific site improvements.
Ending: The meeting combined routine agenda business with a handful of contentious land-use and licensing matters. Several contested items were advanced with explicit statements from councilmembers that any subsequent noncompliance would prompt enforcement or show-cause proceedings.

