Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Upzoning Feedback topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge caution on citywide upzoning: parking, infrastructure, trees and affordability top concerns
Summary
More than two dozen residents addressed the Planning Commission during public comment, opposing a blanket upzoning approach in the comprehensive plan and raising specific concerns about infrastructure capacity, parking, tree loss, neighborhood scale and the limits of market‑rate density to produce affordable homes.
Dozens of residents addressed the Planning Commission during the public comment period on March 25, voicing a steady stream of concerns about proposed upzoning and the comprehensive land use plan.
Speakers said a single, citywide upzoning approach would not account for the wide variation in neighborhood character and infrastructure capacity across Ann Arbor. Common themes included: the age and limited capacity of water, sewer and electrical systems in older neighborhoods; the impact of increased on‑street parking when off‑street parking is not required; loss of sunlight for homes and private solar arrays; risks to tree canopy and green infrastructure; snow‑removal and trash collection challenges on narrower streets; and the potential for small owner‑occupied homes to be razed and replaced by larger rental developments that may not be affordable to teachers, nurses and other essential workers.
Several speakers said that market‑rate upzoning alone will not make housing affordable for the city—s workforce and urged the commission to prioritize owner‑occupied starter homes, duplexes and other missing‑middle housing rather than large apartment buildings. Some commenters suggested alternatives such as targeted redevelopment sites (for example Briarwood Mall and Packard corridor parcels), conditional zoning that extracts community benefits from developers, or greater support for programs that remove land from speculative markets.
Multiple speakers also objected to proposed reductions in public notice and opportunities for neighborhood comment on development projects, saying earlier notification, neighborhood meetings and visible on‑site signage are critical to allow neighbors time to respond.
A smaller number of speakers supported greater density to address a housing shortage and argued that restrictions limiting new housing supply have contributed to rising costs; those speakers urged the commission to move forward with zoning changes that allow duplexes, triplexes, townhomes and small apartment buildings through the city.
Commissioners acknowledged the broad range of concerns and said the commission will have opportunities to refine the draft plan and the code changes as the review and public engagement process proceeds.
