Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comments Mdt Overcrowding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Family members and advocates press DOC on MDT referrals, civil‑commitment delays and overcrowding at Newton

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Multiple public commenters urged the DOC to revise the multidisciplinary team process, speed attorney‑general reviews for civil commitment referrals and address overcrowding, program reductions and alleged medical and food concerns at Newton Correctional Facility.

During the public‑comment portion of the meeting, family members, formerly incarcerated advocates and prison reform advocates raised multiple concerns about the multidisciplinary team (MDT) process for civil‑commitment referrals, waiting times on attorney‑general reviews, overcrowding at Newton Correctional Facility (NCF) and reductions in programming and volunteer access.

Dawn Beauvmire read a message from an incarcerated person describing frustration with risk assessments and long waits for parole or civil‑commitment decisions.

A public commenter identified as Dave urged two specific reforms: (1) revise the MDT evaluation process to allow prisoner self‑advocacy and to inform people of referral reasons, and (2) require at least a basic psychological evaluation before referral because, he said, "Iowa code specifically requires the MDT to make an evaluation as to whether the prisoner has a mental abnormality" but the MDT, he contended, does not include testing or a clinician qualified to make that assessment.

Multiple commenters said referrals to the attorney general for civil‑commitment review have produced long waits that contribute to overcrowding at NCF; one commenter restated an estimate heard in the meeting that roughly 50 people are referred annually and, if the average additional wait is four years, about 200 people could be awaiting AG review at any time.

Other public concerns included allegations of decreased food quality or quantity at Newton because of overcrowding, reductions in volunteer access and programming (including university arts and music programs), lengthy uses of solitary confinement and a fatality in September 2024 that commenters said may have involved alleged medical neglect. Advocates asked the board to press the attorney general to speed the review process and to have an AG representative at a future meeting to discuss MDT procedures.

Board chair Jim Webster and staff said they are discussing the possibility of having an attorney‑general representative at the April meeting and indicated the board would meet in person in April so the AG could attend. The board approved the November minutes and recorded a motion with the understanding the April meeting would be in person and the AG invited.