Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation Roads topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Fiscal Court approves KY Transportation Cabinet recommendations for rural road program

2682802 · March 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

McCreary County accepted the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet's rural secondary program recommendations for fiscal year 2025–2026, approving a resurface project on Kentucky 700 and authorizing staff to submit flex-fund selections to the Cabinet.

McCreary County Fiscal Court on March 13 accepted the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet’s (KYTC) recommendations for the county’s 2025–2026 rural secondary road program, including a resurface of Kentucky 700.

The county’s rural secondary allotment for the next fiscal year was listed in the KYTC packet as $1,553,628. The county’s rural secondary road system was reported as 139.165 miles. The KYTC document set routine maintenance at $776,800 and listed $3,875 for the county judge’s expense; that leaves $935,713 available for improvements, of which $233,044 was identified as county flex funds.

KYTC recommended resurfacing Kentucky 700 from the end of state maintenance to the intersection with U.S. 27, a distance of 5.487 miles. The Cabinet asked that the fiscal court indicate, when submitting flex-fund recommendations, whether the county plans to perform the work or whether it will be completed by a contractor.

A magistrate made a motion to accept the KYTC recommendations and to forward flex-fund selections; the motion was seconded. The court approved the recommendation by roll call: all present voted yes and the motion carried.

Bradley New, identified in the packet as transportation engineer supervisor, District 8 (Monticello section), authored the KYTC recommendations included in the court’s meeting packet. The court did not at the meeting authorize specific construction contracts; it approved the Cabinet’s list and directed staff to transmit flex-fund choices to KYTC.

Court members and staff noted a project map was included in the packet to show locations. The court did not specify a construction schedule at the meeting; KYTC will manage project timing and contract procurement when funds are programmed.