Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Drainage Flooding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press Wilson County Road Commission over recurring creek flooding and blocked cross drains
Summary
Several homeowners described recurring flooding that they say results from blocked pipes and uncleared creek channels near Leeville Road, Glable Road and adjacent properties; county road staff explained limits of county authority and possible next steps.
Get email alerts on the Drainage Flooding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Multiple residents told the Wilson County Road Commission on March 13 that creek channels and cross drains near Leeville Road, Glable Road and nearby private properties are not being maintained and that the situation is causing recurring flooding of a neighboring home.
At the meeting a homeowner said the creek “needs to be cleaned out” and reported that the stream has been blocked for decades; another attendee said the pipe had been closed “for well over 15 years.” Residents described standing water that reaches under a nearby house and debris that flows across the road when the creek overtops its channel.
County road-division staff explained the commission’s operational limits. A staff member said the county “manages stormwater under our roads” and that the road department’s authority generally covers the right-of-way and structures that pass water under county roadways. The staff member said work that occurs entirely off county right-of-way is typically a private matter between adjoining landowners and may require civil remedies or coordination between property owners.
Staff suggested possible remedies if a cross drain or pipe is located in county right-of-way: clean the ditch, probe for rock depth to determine constructability, or reopen an existing pipe if a lawful cross drain exists. The staff cautioned the commission that in many locations rock is shallow and the county does not have equipment to cut rock, so solutions may be limited to cleaning the surface or building a ditch where feasible. The staff also described that roadside ditches typically convey a two-year storm and that larger storms will overtop them.
Residents named a neighboring property owner, identified in the meeting as Eric Holdren, as intending to reopen a pipe or cross drain on his land; neighbors said reopening an historic cross drain could channel water onto a lower-lying yard and under a house. One resident said she had used a bobcat on her own property to clear debris and plant vegetation to protect soil.
The commission and staff advised residents to document the location and, when appropriate, allow staff and James (county staff) to inspect the site. Staff said they would investigate whether a buried cross drain exists in county right-of-way and whether maintenance or reopening is appropriate. Staff warned that if a privately owned cross drain exists on private land, the county cannot authorize work off right-of-way and that owners or developers are responsible for drainage on their property.
No formal action (motions or votes) on the drainage issues was recorded in the meeting transcript; staff directed follow-up inspections and indicated possible work if the feature is within county right-of-way.

