Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves minutes, consent agenda and multiple policies; votes at a glance
Summary
At its Feb. 12 meeting the Snohomish School District board approved minutes for Jan. 22, revised personnel reports, the consent agenda, Resolution O225 (petty cash), final acceptance of the Glacier Peak contract, and several policies including student fees and immigration-related policies.
The Snohomish School District Board of Directors recorded and approved the following actions at its Feb. 12 meeting. Voice votes carried each item; the public transcript records aye/oppose calls but no roll-call tallies.
Votes at a glance
- Approval of minutes: Board workshop (Jan. 22) and regular board meeting (Jan. 22). Outcome: approved by voice vote.
- Agenda revision: Revised personnel reports added to the agenda. Outcome: approved by voice vote.
- Consent agenda: Approval of the consent agenda as amended. Outcome: approved by voice vote.
- Resolution O225: Eliminate petty cash and update change funds. Outcome: approved by voice vote. (See separate article for details.)
- Final acceptance of contract with Value Electric for Glacier Peak Security Camera project, $520,065.52. Outcome: approved by voice vote. (See separate article for details.)
- Policy 3,520: Student fees, fines and charges. Outcome: approved by voice vote.
- Policy 4,300: Limiting immigration enforcement in schools. Outcome: approved by voice vote. (See separate article for details.)
- Policy 03/1926: Interviews and interrogations of students on school premises. Outcome: approved by voice vote. (See separate article for details.)
- Policy 3 4 2 1: Child abuse and neglect. Outcome: approved by voice vote. (See separate article for details.)
- Policy 4,310: Relationships with law enforcement. Outcome: approved by voice vote. (See separate article for details.)
The transcript records brief discussion on a few items (for example, the student-fees policy and the explanation of petty cash versus change funds) and public comment on other items (notably immigration-related policies). No roll-call vote counts were published in the meeting transcript.
