Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Miami Beach committee asks attorneys to study criminal penalties, orders historic‑replication rule after Deauville concerns
Summary
Committee members asked the city attorney to research criminal penalties and other enforcement paths for buildings allowed to decay, and the committee favored a draft ordinance that would create a presumption requiring replication of contributing historic buildings demolished without prior approval.
The committee on March 4 began two linked actions aimed at stronger enforcement against demolition‑by‑neglect of historic properties: staff will study whether criminal penalties or other enforcement tools are available, and the committee forwarded a draft ordinance that creates a rebuttable presumption requiring replication of contributing buildings destroyed without an approved Certificate of Appropriateness.
Background: Commissioners raised the Deauville property as a prompt for both initiative and review of existing enforcement tools. The draft ordinance strengthens the existing code presumption by adding clearer standards and tying any required replication review to the Secretary of the Interior’s standards to make the requirement more legally defensible on appeal.
Legal and policy work requested: committee members asked the city attorney and administration to prepare options on whether municipal criminal sanctions (up to the state statutory limits) or other civil/debarment remedies can be applied in willful neglect cases; they also asked staff to detail how such penalties would work against entities that are LLCs or other ownership structures. The committee asked that legal exposure and due‑process protections be identified and that staff return with draft language and legal analysis in May.
What the ordinance would do: the draft forwarded by staff would make replication the starting presumption where a contributing historic building was demolished without a required Certificate of Appropriateness or allowed to decay to the point of demolition. The Historic Preservation Board (HPB) could overturn the presumption only if specific criteria are met; staff said the Secretary of the Interior standards would be used to evaluate proposed replication and strengthen the city’s position on appeal.
Committee action: members approved sending the draft preservation ordinance to the commission as a C‑4 referral to initiate Planning Board review and asked the city attorney’s office to report on criminal penalties and other enforcement options; the item was set for further committee review in May.
Quotes: “People’s lives depend on the way that they maintain their property,” Commissioner Fernandez said, summarizing the safety rationale behind stronger enforcement. Staff noted the existing building‑official authorities for immediate life‑safety enforcement and the need to coordinate code enforcement with preservation policy.
Ending: The committee will receive a legal memorandum on potential criminal and civil enforcement mechanisms and broader policy options on demolition‑by‑neglect, and staff will carry the preservation draft forward to the Planning Board for review per the committee’s referral.
