Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Annexation Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board drops word “opposition,” backs original annexation resolution after road concerns addressed
Summary
Following extensive discussion about road jurisdiction, RISE grants and traffic studies, Pottawattamie County supervisors voted 4–1 to return to an earlier resolution supporting the voluntary annexation proposal adjacent to 190 Second Street with language modified to remove expressed opposition.
Pottawattamie County supervisors debated and then returned to an earlier resolution supporting a voluntary annexation proposal near 190 Second Street, removing language that described the board as in opposition. The vote to proceed with the original resolution passed 4–1.
Board members spent an extended period reviewing two competing drafts: one that framed the county as opposing the annexation application and a prior draft that expressed conditional support while enumerating county concerns. Supervisors and staff discussed traffic and jurisdictional issues for a roadway near the county shooting range, the need for a traffic study from the developer, and which entity would apply for RISE grant funding to bring the road to required standards.
Speakers noted the developer’s site design requires rail access and that most product shipments will use rail and interstate ramps, not residential routes. Board members described conversations with city staff and county engineers and said a traffic study was expected to be released to the county during the week following the meeting. John (county staff) and Matt Cox (public works director) were cited as participants in technical meetings reviewing traffic analysis.
Board members who favored the original resolution argued the county should be a “player and a partner” in development and not signal blanket opposition to economic development, while continuing to press for agreements on road maintenance and grant application responsibilities. Supervisors also discussed a possible reengineering of the roadway and the need for a bridge over Mosquito Creek as future work.
After motions and amendments that removed language describing the county’s opposition and that eliminated directives for the city, the board held a roll call: Chairman Belk voted no; Supervisors Whitman, Miller, Shea and Jorgensen voted aye. The motion carried.
The board instructed staff to coordinate on traffic, maintenance and grant strategies and to proceed with the version of the resolution that supports the annexation subject to the county’s negotiated concerns being formally addressed in the annexation process and state review.
