Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Boards Commissions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council moves to dissolve inactive committee, asks subcommittee to study boards and commissions consolidation
Summary
Raleigh council voted to remove the defunct Mayor's Committee on Compassion and directed staff and a newly formed council subcommittee to study consolidation, bylaws, nominating committees and support for advisory boards and commissions, with a July 1 target for recommendations.
The City Council took action on advisory boards and commissions issues, removing an inactive mayoral committee and asking for a targeted review of boards' structure and bylaws.
Community Engagement Director Tyesha Moseley briefed council on the city's 29 advisory boards and commissions, 26 of which appear in the online application system Grandicus and 20 of which receive staff support. Moseley noted staff-created resources including a training handbook and an annual work‑plan requirement for advisory boards. "You all have 29 boards and commissions that are included on your website," Moseley said, summarizing the inventory.
Councillors discussed concerns about duplicative work among boards, meeting efficiency for volunteers, and nominating‑committee practices. Several councilmembers said nominating committees can be useful for recommending skill sets but cautioned against ceding appointment authority. Councilmember Lambert Melton said: "We seem to just be allowing, deferring all of our authority to the nominating committees... we absolutely should not be saying... we just want you to put a stamp of approval on them." Councilmember Jones and others described nominating committees as a potential time‑saving advisory tool when council liaisons cannot attend every board meeting.
Council moved to remove the defunct Mayor's Committee on Compassion and established a temporary four‑member council subcommittee (members volunteered during the meeting) to review consolidation opportunities, bylaws and nominating‑committee language. The council asked the subcommittee to work in short order and return recommendations by July 1.
Ending: The council directed staff and the ad hoc council subcommittee to analyze overlaps, committee purpose, meeting efficiency, transparency of appointment processes and budgets for board activities; findings and any proposed consolidation or bylaw changes will be reported back to council by the July target date.
