Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board narrows short‑term rental rules, adds acreage and spacing tests amid housing concerns
Summary
Supervisors approved amendments to short-term rental rules for inland and coastal zones, including new acreage carve-outs for agricultural-zoned parcels, a larger neighborhood spacing radius and other technical changes; motion passed 3–2 after extended discussion about housing supply and farm-stay definitions.
The Humboldt County Board of Supervisors voted 3–2 March 11 to amend the county’s inland and coastal short‑term rental ordinances, changing how the county treats short‑term rentals on smaller agricultural parcels, adjusting neighborhood-concentration rules and clarifying road‑access standards.
Board action and purpose The board approved staff’s proposed ordinance changes with several member amendments. The final motion replaced the ordinance’s “nearest 10 houses as the crow flies” neighborhood test with a distance-based test and increased the neighborhood separation radius in the motion to 600 feet from the proposed 300-foot standard; it also added a 2.5‑acre threshold for certain agricultural-zoned parcels and allowed home-share short‑term rentals on smaller agricultural parcels with administrative review. The motion carried 3–2.
Why staff proposed the changes Planning staff said the amendments respond to implementation problems identified since the short‑term rental rules were adopted. Key changes were intended to: • Clarify requirement for access roads by changing the standard from “built to category 3 standard” to “functionally equivalent to a category 3 road,” which staff said better reflects local road realities and is interpreted with Public Works input; • Create exceptions to allow short‑term rentals on some agricultural (AG) parcels that are too small to function as working ag land (different treatment by lot size); and • Revise neighborhood concentration measures so the earlier “as the crow flies” rule would not link distant neighborhoods.
Board debate: housing vs. land‑use protections Supervisors debated competing goals: preserve agricultural land and neighborhood character, while avoiding conversion of scarce housing into visitor units. Several supervisors cautioned against making it easier to convert housing stock into short‑term rentals given local housing shortages; others said the revisions recognize small, subdivided AG parcels cannot realistically be farmed and need options for owner income.
Key technical points from staff and Public Works Planning director John Ford said the road‑standard wording change avoids requiring costly road reconstructions in places where existing roads already function at required capacity. Public Works staff recommended site‑specific reviews using traffic and ITS (Institute of Transportation Studies) standards, noting short‑term rentals on existing homes often produce less traffic than a long‑term household.
Public comment and outcome Speakers included property owners and community members who urged clear standards, affordable application fees and protection of neighborhood character. After amendments to staff text — chiefly changing the AG carve‑out thresholds and increasing the spacing radius to 600 feet — the board approved the ordinance amendments 3–2. The coastal change will be forwarded to the California Coastal Commission for certification where required.
Next steps Planning will finalize ordinance language, publish required summaries and transmit the coastal-zone amendment to the Coastal Commission for certification.
