Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cannabis Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board dissolves Cannabis Ordinance Task Force; staff to draft Article 73 and present summary before Planning Commission
Summary
The Lake County Board of Supervisors on March 18 accepted staff’s recommendation to conclude the Cannabis Ordinance Task Force and transition the group's work to formal ordinance drafting.
Get email alerts on the Cannabis Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Lake County Board of Supervisors on March 18 accepted staff’s recommendation to conclude the Cannabis Ordinance Task Force and transition the group's work to formal ordinance drafting. Community Development Director Maria Turner told the board the task force — convened June 7, 2022 and originally intended as a six‑month process — has provided sufficient direction for staff to prepare a draft ordinance (proposed "Article 73") updating local cannabis regulations.
"Staff feels that we have received sufficient direction from the task force to transition over to our actual drafting of the ordinance," Maria Turner said. She told the board no formal action to adopt an ordinance is required at this meeting and that the draft would be routed to advisory bodies and public hearings before returning to the board.
Nut graf: The board dissolved the ad‑hoc task force by motion and unanimous vote but directed staff to return with a summary of proposed changes before the draft is transmitted to the Planning Commission. Public commenters praised the task force’s work while urging additional opportunities for in‑depth comment on technical issues such as odor control for outdoor cultivation, environmental protections and retail/market issues.
Board process and next steps
Turner told supervisors the ordinance will be forwarded first to the Agricultural Advisory Committee and then to the Planning Commission for noticed public hearings before coming back to the board for final action. Supervisor Lloyd Sabatier asked whether the board could review a summary or notice of intent before the Planning Commission review "so other than that I appreciate the update"; Turner agreed to provide a concise summary comparing the proposed changes with the current Article 7 and to present that material to the board before Planning Commission submittal.
Public comment and stakeholder views
Several speakers who had participated on the task force or who represent local agriculture and industry praised the multi‑year effort. Rebecca Harper of the Lake County Farm Bureau and Bridal Dalbaca of the Lake County Cannabis Association (LCCA) thanked staff and task force members for the time spent on the ordinance update and said streamlined, state‑aligned local rules could help licensed growers and county revenue. Andrea Dobbs Kramer and other commenters highlighted the industry’s economic role and encouraged alignment with state policy.
Other commenters voiced concern that the public’s window for detailed comment may be narrow once the draft ordinance begins the formal hearing process. Margo Kambara, who identified herself as an environmental restoration subject matter expert, said the three‑minute public‑comment format at subsequent Commission hearings may be insufficient for technical topics such as odor control for outdoor cultivation and environmental regulation: "The constraints will make it difficult to cover the topics that really need some in‑depth discussion such as odor control for outdoor grows and such as, you know, the environmental ... regulations and other, other concerns." Turner and supervisors said there will be multiple opportunities for public input as the draft moves through committee and commission hearings.
Board action
Supervisor motioned to dissolve the task force and the board voted unanimously to do so. The board also gave staff direction to draft the ordinance, route it to the Agricultural Advisory Committee and Planning Commission for recommendation and public hearings, and present a summary of proposed changes to the board before Planning Commission review.
Ending: Staff will prepare the draft Article 73, schedule the advisory committee and Planning Commission hearings, and return to the board with the requested summary and a table comparing proposed changes to existing local rules.

