Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate declines to pass bill continuing state Criminal Justice Commission
Summary
Senate Bill 12-79, a proposal to continue and restructure the Arizona Criminal Justice Commission, failed on the floor after extended debate. Proponents warned the state would lose grant administration and victim-support functions; opponents criticized management and said the bill would be amended in the House.
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Arizona Senate on March 17 failed to pass Senate Bill 12-79, legislation concerning the Arizona Criminal Justice Commission (ACJC) and its continuation.
Senators debated the bill on the floor, with proponents arguing that ACJC administers millions in grants and essential victim and public-safety programs. A senator explaining a "no" vote urged colleagues not to dissolve or cripple the commission, saying it administers more than $20 million in grants annually and has managed roughly $180 million in grants since 2016 that support victim compensation, indigent defense, treatment programs and statewide reporting.
Opponents said the commission had been mismanaged and that the bill as written gave disproportionate influence to sheriffs; they said the measure would likely be amended in the House to add more municipal representation and remove provisions the Freedom Caucus opposed. One opponent said the bill duplicated information already collected by national reporting systems and that continuing the commission in its current form warranted further fixes.
On the reconsideration vote the Senate recorded 13 ayes, 13 nays and 3 not voting; the motion to pass SB 12-79 on reconsideration failed. Senators who spoke urged further negotiations rather than an abrupt termination of the agency's duties.
Because the commission administers federally and state-mandated grant programs, senators on both sides of the debate noted that any legislative change could disrupt funding flows for local agencies, victim services and criminal justice programming.
