Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Food Systems topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate advances SJR11 to study farmers markets and local food systems after debate over regulation
Summary
Senate Joint Resolution 11, an interim-study request to analyze farmers markets and local food systems, passed second reading in the Committee of the Whole, 36–14, after debate about regulation, fees and the study’s cost and purpose.
Senate Joint Resolution 11, a one-year interim study on farmers markets and local food systems, was recommended for passage by the Committee of the Whole and passed on second reading with a recorded vote of 36–14.
Sponsor Senator Gillespie framed the study as an effort to review regulatory frameworks, value-added agriculture and ways to enhance farmers markets statewide. “We’re going to be looking at some regulatory frameworks surrounding these markets, how to make them even better,” he said, adding the study will report its final results to the 70th Legislature.
Opponents cautioned against additional regulation. Senator Emmerich said he opposed the study because he feared it could lead to increased regulation, fees and taxes on farmers markets, arguing Montana should preserve limited regulatory burdens. Senator Hertz said he would support the study but flagged that food statutes are complex and may need consolidation or cleanup.
A procedural question about interim-study cost drew a quick exchange: Senator Benton asked the cost of an interim study; the sponsor replied, “Probably 10,” without specifying units. The transcript does not record a formal fiscal estimate; therefore the total cost is not specified in the committee record.
The committee adopted the motion recommending the study. The clerk recorded 36 ayes and 14 nays on second reading.
