Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Recreation Facility Setback topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

BZA tables variance for indoor training facility at Big Walnut Elementary after easement concerns

2667789 · March 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A requested reduction of the side-yard setback from 25 to 8 feet for a proposed 40-foot-wide indoor training facility at Big Walnut Elementary was tabled to the April meeting so staff can research a 1969 access easement raised by adjacent property owners.

The Sunbury Board of Zoning Appeals on March 17 voted to table a variance request for Big Walnut Elementary after neighbors raised questions about an existing access easement and the location of existing structures.

The applicant, represented by Bart Apple, board president of the Big Walnut Baseball and Softball Association, asked for a side-yard setback reduction from 25 feet to 8 feet so the group could build a 40-foot-wide indoor training facility to replace outdoor batting cages damaged in storms. Apple told the board the facility would serve roughly 600 youth participants annually and would be used by recreational and school teams; coaches would use electronic access codes to enter the building.

Board members and nearby landowners asked whether the new structure would encroach on a long-established access easement that runs from Jackson Street to the school property. Eric Clucker, representing adjacent owner PML Farms, said the easement and related drainage tile are maintained as public infrastructure and asked the board to delay action until the easement status and any potential conflicts with existing structures are researched.

City staff confirmed a one-page letter from the school district had been submitted to the record and agreed to verify the legal description and easement documents. With the consent of the applicant the board voted to table the variance to the BZA’s next meeting so staff can research easement ownership, the location of the existing structure, and potential public-infrastructure impacts. The motion to table passed with six yeas.