Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Schools Public Comments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public comment at supervisors' meeting raises concerns about school safety, student support and transparency
Summary
Two members of the public used the Feb. 26 comment period to urge changes in school oversight — one called for more student support staff and described an unresolved personal allegation, another criticized school spending and administration — while supervisors reiterated limits of board authority over school operations and noted budget oversight.
During the Feb. 26 citizen‑comment period two speakers raised serious concerns about Frederick County Public Schools.
Scarlett Meadows, who identified herself as a former James Wood High School student, urged the county to improve student supports and said she had raised past complaints to school officials that she considered unaddressed. Meadows asked for social‑work resources inside schools and said she had experienced an assault while a student; her remarks were presented as public comment and not as a board finding. She also referenced other student complaints she said had gone unaddressed.
Another commenter, James Molder of the Back Creek District, criticized the size of school‑system administration and urged supervisors to scrutinize school budgets when the school division presents future funding requests. He said the board, which controls appropriation of local funds, should examine where school dollars are spent and asked the board to use its “power of the purse” to press for accountability.
In board comments after public input, supervisors encouraged residents to contact the elected School Board with operational and personnel concerns because the School Board sets policies, staff hiring and curriculum. The board chair and other supervisors said the Board of Supervisors retains budget authority and can pursue financial oversight questions, but cannot direct school personnel decisions once funds are appropriated.
The comments were included in the meeting record; supervisors said they would welcome additional written information from residents and noted that budget choices are addressed in the county appropriation process.
