Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
BRFW committee delays EV-charging rule choices, asks for forecasting and cost analysis
Summary
The committee tabled three competing petitions to change state EV-charging requirements (proposals 068, 122 and 135) and asked staff and stakeholders to submit written proposals, forecasting and cost-benefit analysis so the committee can bring a consolidated recommendation to the full council.
The Building Code Council BRFW Committee on March 14 tabled three competing petitions that would alter the state’s EV-charging requirements in the International Building Code and asked for additional written analysis, forecasting and stakeholder input before making a recommendation to the full council.
The three petitions under review address the IBC parking/EV table (section 429) but take different approaches. Proposal 068 seeks to reduce certain EV thresholds (Dustin noted one change from 25% to 15% in the table), while proposals 122 and 135 would increase one or more categories of required EV infrastructure, including EV-capable parking spaces. The committee described 068 as a reduction intended to lower near-term costs for builders; proponents of the increases said…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
