Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Preliminary Plats Summit Views Butters Heritage topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning commission grants preliminary plat approvals for two subdivisions

2664796 · March 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission granted preliminary plat approval for Summit Views Phase 2 and Butters Heritage Subdivision, subject to city engineer memos and other staff/agency requirements.

HARRISVILLE, Utah — The Harrisville City Planning Commission granted preliminary plat approval for two residential subdivisions during its meeting: Summit Views Phase 2 (approximately 125 West 1100 North) and Butters Heritage Subdivision (approximately 122 East Larson Lane). Both approvals were made subject to conditions in city engineer memos and any additional staff or agency requirements.

Summit Views Phase 2: Staff presented the city engineer’s memo dated March 6, 2025, which primarily required adding addresses to the plat, correcting red-line items and obtaining final approval of subdivision improvement drawings from the administrative lands authority. The commission approved the preliminary plat subject to the engineer’s memo and any agency requirements; the decision was announced by the chair and recorded as passing on a voice vote.

Butters Heritage Subdivision: The commission reviewed the city engineer’s memo dated March 4, 2025, which included requirements to submit a recent title report covering the proposed property, present the plat to the Weber County surveyor’s office for review and approval, show public and municipal utility easements on the plat, and address red-line comments. The commission moved and seconded to grant preliminary plat approval for Butters Heritage subject to the March 4 engineer memo and other staff or agency requirements; the motion passed by voice vote.

Both approvals included typical conditions to correct mapping and boundary-line discrepancies noted by the city engineer and to ensure lot addressing does not conflict with neighboring jurisdictions or delivery services. No roll-call vote with individual commissioners’ votes was recorded in the meeting transcript.