Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Berkeley County land-use committee approves multiple rezones, denies firearms-range amendment and postpones sewer-dependent request
Summary
The Berkeley County Land Use Committee voted on a slate of rezoning requests and zoning-map amendments, approving several rezonings, denying an amendment to allow firearms and archery ranges in an Ag Flex-1 district, and postponing a density rezoning that depends on extending sewer service.
The Berkeley County Land Use Committee considered more than a dozen zoning and map-change items and took votes on a series of bills, approving several rezonings, denying one amendment to permit shooting ranges in an agricultural zoning district and postponing a sewer-dependent rezoning.
The committee denied bill 25-14, an amendment to Section 4S-6.4.7 of the Berkeley County Zoning and Development Standards Ordinance to establish firearms and archery ranges as a special-exception use in the Agricultural Flex-1 district. A motion to deny carried on a voice vote.
The committee approved bill 25-15, a rezoning request for a +/-0.66-acre portion of TMS 222-00-00-018 (Edgebrook Drive) to allow subdivision for single-family detached homes. Staff and the planning commission had recommended approval and there was no recorded opposition at the planning commission.
The committee postponed bill 25-16, a request to rezone a +/-2.4-acre parcel (TMS 233-02-04-031) from Manufactured Residential (R-2) to Mobile Home Park (R-3). Planning staff recommended denial until the applicant demonstrates the ability to extend public sewer; R-3 densities require public water and sewer. Councilman Newell moved to postpone; Councilman Owens seconded and the motion to postpone carried.
The committee approved bill 25-17, a rezoning of a +/-9.39-acre parcel (TMS 196-00-00-008) from R-2 to General Commercial (GC) in County Council District 6. Committee members discussed future right-of-way needs and sewer/water coordination; staff described the presented plan as conceptual and the applicant indicated willingness to coordinate reservations for right-of-way.
Additional zoning matters were handled in batch votes: bills numbered 25-18, 25-20, 25-21, 25-22, 25-08, 25-09, 25-10 and combined items 25-11/25-12 and 25-03/25-04 were moved and carried as presented by voice vote. Bill 25-19 (a +/-1.88-acre rezoning request on Lyon Lane) was denied on a voice vote.
Why it matters: rezonings change allowable uses and density on county parcels and can affect traffic, sewer and water planning and future development patterns. The committee explicitly postponed at least one item (25-16) until the applicant can demonstrate sewer extension feasibility, signaling the committee’s attention to infrastructure constraints in approving density changes.
Votes at a glance
- Bill 25-14 (amend ZDSO Sec. 4S-6.4.7 to allow firearms/archery ranges in Ag Flex-1): denied (motion carried by voice vote). Mover/second: motion/second recorded; mover identified in discussion as Councilman Davis; second recorded in meeting as Councilman Pinkney (as recorded in committee minutes). - Bill 25-15 (Edgebrook rezoning, +/-0.66 acre): approved (staff and planning commission recommended approval; no planning commission opposition). Mover: Councilman Newell; Second: Councilman Owens. - Bill 25-16 (PR R Home Enterprise LLC; +/-2.4 acres to R-3): postponed (Councilman Newell moved; Councilman Owens seconded). Staff recommended denial pending sewer extension demonstration. - Bill 25-17 (Crazy 8 LLC; +/-9.39 acres to GC): approved (motion by Councilman West; second by Councilman Pinkney). Committee discussed right-of-way and conceptual plan coordination. - Bill 25-19 (Jaren and Adam Quick; +/-1.88 acres): denied (motion by Councilman Pinkney; second by Councilman Davis). - Bills 25-18, 25-20, 25-21, 25-22, 25-08, 25-09, 25-10, combined 25-11/25-12, combined 25-03/25-04 and 25-01: approved/carried as presented (motions recorded; vote by voice vote). Specific mover/second recorded in committee minutes when given; otherwise approvals were by committee voice vote.
What committee members emphasized: multiple members asked applicants about infrastructure — especially sewer and right-of-way needs — before approving increases in residential density or commercial designations. Staff repeatedly noted that certain densities (R-3) require both public water and public sewer and recommended denial where sewer extension had not been demonstrated.
The committee advanced approved bills to subsequent readings as indicated by county procedure; the postponed item will return after the applicant provides information about sewer extension costs or plans.
