Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Recordings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sun City West delays vote on recordings policy after debate over editing, retention
Summary
Directors debated proposed policy L14 that would keep meeting recordings unedited and retain them five years; concerns about derogatory language, pending state legislation and access led the board to return the policy to Director Novello for revision.
At the Feb. 14 workshop the board reviewed agenda item 3.01, proposed policy L14 governing recordings of governing-board and committee meetings.
Director Christine Novello presented a draft that, as edited in committee, would make recordings available unedited and retain recordings under an operations procedure for records retention; Novello proposed a five-year minimum retention if no other records-retention schedule applied.
Directors and members raised several concerns. Some directors opposed keeping recordings forever in an unedited form if they include profanity or derogatory language directed at an individual; Director Tim Hurley said such items —20do not need to be kept in perpetuity.—20 Other directors flagged pending state legislation on recorded meetings that would require retention for a shorter period and would require making unedited recordings available on request. CFO Cliff Swan told the board the proposed five-year retention is longer than the pending legislation, which his team understood to call for retention measured in months (committee members cited both three and six months in discussion). The general manager and staff noted they have technical ability to download and archive recordings hosted on YouTube and that staff are evaluating alternate tools.
Public comment included a note that YouTube keeps files for nine months (a resident cited Anne Becknell on that point) and requests from residents that recordings be retained longer because community matters often move slowly.
The board did not move the policy to the regular meeting for a vote. By consensus the board directed Director Novello to revise the draft to align explicitly with the number in the pending legislation and to bring it back; no final policy was approved at the workshop.
—20My intent was to remove censorship language and present recordings as they happened,—20 Novello said, while acknowledging the board could align the retention period with state law. Director Hurley said he supported access but worried about keeping repeated derogatory language in perpetuity.
Next steps: Director Novello will revise L14 to reflect board feedback and pending state requirements, and return the edited policy for further committee and board consideration.
