Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows
Governing board approved revised RRMPs after committee edits; clubs urged to submit further changes
Loading...
Summary
The Charter Clubs Committee reviewed the governing board's February action approving revised RRMPs with edits to section 7.1 removed and encouraged clubs to submit additional suggested edits for future review.
Director Chattin told the committee that, at the Feb. 20 governing board meeting, directors reviewed the latest revisions to the RRMPs and specifically removed newly proposed restrictions in section 7.1 of chapter 8.
"There was considerable discussion on areas that should be considered for additional editing or reorganization or deletion," the chair said, noting that the board approved the revised RRMPs with the changes to section 7.1 eliminated. The committee was asked to collect any additional suggested edits and forward them for future consideration.
Committee members representing charter clubs reported they had reviewed draft changes and in many cases provided feedback. Nancy, a committee member and club liaison, said the Spanish Club had suggested a few positive changes and that most club presidents had read and discussed the revisions with their memberships.
Casey Huda, charter clubs manager, told the committee the posted RRMPs and updated incident/accident form are available on the clubs website and that the documents carry a date stamp so clubs can confirm they are using the current versions. "Our RMPs have been posted, so they are on SCW Club's website," Casey said.
The committee reiterated that the RRMP review is an annual process and invited directors and residents to submit additional modifications to the Charter Clubs Committee. The chair and members noted that, although hundreds of hours went into the prior review, further changes may be considered in the next RRMP cycle.
Committee members discussed communication and participation concerns about a recent working-group process used for other issues; several members requested clearer distribution of working-group summaries back to the full committee so absent members could review outcomes before items move forward.
