Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Accountability And Assessment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Virginia DOE sets timeline to release retooled accountability and accreditation results in early October

6112595 · September 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The department will release internal student‑level rosters and indicator reports to divisions this week and plans a public release of accountability and accreditation results the week of Oct. 6, the agency said. Officials emphasized the separation of accountability measures from accreditation compliance.

The Virginia Department of Education told the board it will release detailed student‑level rosters and indicator reports to school divisions this week and expects to post the public school accountability and accreditation results the week of Oct. 6.

Mark, the department’s accountability presenter, told the board the state has “decoupled” two systems that historically had been blended: a framework-based accountability system that measures student outcomes and a separate accreditation system that measures compliance with professional standards and inputs. He described accountability as “collecting and using information to make decisions and improve outcomes for students and schools,” while accreditation focuses on institutional capacity and compliance.

The internal release schedule laid out in the meeting record: divisions will first access student‑level rosters and indicator reports; early next week the department will release school and division summary reports internally; and the week of Oct. 6 the department plans to publicly release the consolidated information, including framework scores (0–100), an accreditation designation, performance categories (distinguished, on track, off track, needs support), federal identifications and required reporting items such as graduation rates.

On accreditation, the department warned stakeholders the regulations include an “accreditation denied” designation but also said that, because the agency reset its regulations for 2024–25, “no school will be accreditation denied” for the 2024–25 reporting year. The presenter said accreditation denied requires a pattern of condition accreditation and that the current reset prevents that designation this year.

The department said the public materials will be parent‑facing and will include a communication toolkit for divisions. Officials said divisions asked for more time to process results and prepare communications; as a result the department extended the internal embargo period so divisions can review data and craft messages.

The department also previewed plans to improve student score reports and diagnostics so parents and teachers better understand test performance by reporting question‑level detail and actionable next steps. The presenter said the goal is for score reports to be “meaningful for the parents” and to connect families with the school staff who can help.

Board members asked for clarity about timelines and the relationship between accreditation and the accountability framework. The department stressed it will continue stakeholder briefings and will provide training and materials for local leaders and teachers to ensure reports are interpreted correctly.