Bloomington Council approves 12-year Axon public-safety technology contract worth $13.56 million
Loading...
Summary
The council voted to approve a bundled 12-year equipment and services agreement with Axon covering body cameras, in-car cameras, tasers, drones and records-management services; city officials said the package locks pricing and provides maintenance and upgrades, while critics raised questions about surveillance, AI and contract length.
The Bloomington City Council on Sept. 8 approved a 12-year bundled equipment and services agreement with Axon Enterprise Inc. that city staff said will cover body-worn and in-car cameras, taser refreshes, drones and a records-management system. The total contract figure cited by staff during the meeting was $13,559,883.81.
City officials said the agreement bundles hardware, software and maintenance to secure current equipment, keep pricing stable over time and deliver product upgrades. Deputy City Manager Sue McLaughlin told the council the agreement has been negotiated since July 2024 and “has no connection to the ongoing discussions regarding the shared sales tax agreement with the county, town and the city.”
Bloomington Police Chief Jamal Simonton, who led the presentation with project lead Assistant Chief Aaron Veerman, said Axon’s ecosystem already stores the city’s digital evidence and that the bundled contract would protect against equipment downtime and future price increases. “This agreement will prevent some loss of equipment,” Simonton said, and staff told the council the city currently maintains “over 800 terabytes of digital evidence.” Simonton also said the bundled package could save the city an estimated 7–10% each year compared with piecemeal purchases.
The council asked detailed questions about AI features, audit controls and partner-agency interoperability. Council member Scott asked about safeguards against AI “hallucinations” in draft report generation; Simonton said Axon’s draft-report function is designed to force officers to verify flagged or bracketed text before a report can be finalized, and supervisors must review and attest to reports before submission. Council member Ward asked whether the timing required immediate action; staff replied Axon’s quoted pricing and rollout schedule meant delaying could increase costs, but noted the contract contains non-appropriation language and a right to terminate or remove pieces (for example, the records-management module) under defined conditions.
Staff said the agreement includes features the department uses to manage internal accountability (early-warning dashboards, audited permissions), an AI-assisted redaction assistant to speed FOIA processing, tools for video enhancement for court use, and an option for drones and VR training. Axon representative Jake Sheedy attended the meeting and Chief Simonton described the vendor as “responsive” during prior pilots.
Opponents who spoke during the public comment period raised broader concerns about surveillance and long-term contracts for rapidly evolving technologies. Council members pressed staff on interoperability should neighboring agencies choose different records-management systems; staff said middleware (referred to as Boomi in the presentation) can be used to share records across systems.
The council voted to approve the contract. The clerk announced the motion carried with no nays.
Council members said they expect continued oversight. Simonton said the contract contains warranty clauses and maintenance obligations and that Axon has agreed to provide upgrades or refunds if equipment is not maintained.
What’s next: The contract establishes a framework for equipment replacement and software rollout over the next decade; staff will proceed with implementation and coordinate with neighboring agencies that choose to join or interoperate with the system.
