Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves consent agenda, off‑site dances, RFQ for architects and several personnel authorizations
Summary
At its Sept. 9 meeting the Lake Pend Oreille School District board approved the consent agenda, an off‑site dance request for Sandpoint High School, a request for qualifications for architectural services and multiple alternate authorizations; board emphasized that contracts and project costs will return for approval before work proceeds.
The Lake Pend Oreille School District Board of Trustees on Sept. 9 approved routine business items including the consent agenda, a student request for off‑site dances and a request for qualifications (RFQ) for architectural services.
The board approved the consent agenda by voice vote. Student council senior class president Lily Boat requested approval for three off‑site dances (homecoming, midwinter and prom) to be held at The Hive; the board approved the off‑site dance request.
Chief Financial Officer Brian Wallace presented a request for qualifications for architectural services so the district can assemble a design team should projects arise this year. Wallace told the board the RFQ does not bind the district to any construction contract; any project and the contract terms would return separately to the board for approval. He said a culinary‑arts renovation at Sandpoint High School is one possible project and indicated such a project could fall in a planning range of roughly $750,000 to $1,500,000, should the board later approve it. The board authorized the RFQ process.
The board also approved three alternate authorizations for certificated staff (Nancy Marks, Megan Olsen and Jessica Randolph) after HR director Fred Short was made available for questions. The board approved several policy revisions on second reading (including dress and appearance and other personnel and student policies) and adopted hiring and salary‑placement revisions as presented.
Board Chair called for a motion to adjourn at the meeting’s close; a motion carried and the meeting adjourned at 6:21 p.m.
Ending: These items were approved by the board at the Sept. 9 meeting; any specific contracts, project scopes or capital expenditures must return to the board for separate approval.
