The Potter County Commissioners Court held an extended discussion July 28 about creating a senior project manager position to oversee capital projects and department‑level construction work. Commissioners were split on whether to fund a full‑time position, and the court did not approve hiring; members directed staff to consider the position within the upcoming budget process.

Proponents said a dedicated senior project manager would provide continuous in‑house oversight for construction and maintenance projects countywide, help prepare projects for budget requests and protect the county’s financial interests during procurements and construction. Supporters cited past construction issues and savings that county staff and commissioners said resulted from hands‑on oversight by an existing employee during recent projects.

Opponents questioned the timing and the source of recurring funding. Several commissioners and staff noted constrained revenue forecasts, limits on property‑tax increases and other pressing needs in departments including the fire department and sheriff’s office. One commissioner said a consultant previously offered project management services with claimed savings that would offset fees; others argued a full‑time employee would provide continuous institutional knowledge that consultants do not.

County staff noted options discussed in the meeting: hiring a full‑time staffer, recruiting a project manager on a contract basis when projects exist, or funding the position through the annual budget process. County financial staff explained limits on raising property taxes (a typical annual ceiling of 3.5% without additional voter action) and outlined revenue‑capture options staff can explore during budget preparation.

At the end of discussion the court did not take a hiring vote. Commissioners said the matter must be addressed in the upcoming budget cycle and that staff will return with options and funding scenarios.