Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Exterior Design topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Architectural board requests revisions to 26 Sylvester Avenue siding and deck plans
Summary
The board asked the contractor and owner of 26 Sylvester Avenue to resubmit drawings clarifying window removals, deck rail and column details, and compatibility of proposed octagonal window and shutters with the house style.
The Architectural Review Board asked the owner and contractor for 26 Sylvester Avenue to revise and resubmit exterior plans after members identified inconsistencies and design issues in the submitted package.
Contractor Brian (Saint Louis Building and Remodeling) attended the meeting. Board members said the submission lacked clear plans in the packet and flagged a left‑side elevation that appears to remove a window and fill the opening with wall siding. Tracy Collins asked whether the owner had considered retaining a window or adding a smaller window "so we don't have that big blank wall of siding." The board also requested that the space below a new rear deck be closed with compatible material rather than left open.
On the front porch, the submittal showed a fluted column but a note said the column would be smooth; the contractor confirmed the owner chose a fluted column. Board members suggested a plainer, more substantial column and cap and base that better suit the house style. Members also questioned narrow, existing bay shutters (visible in photos) that appear disproportionate and suggested the owner consider removing awkward, very slim shutters.
The board expressed concern about an octagonal gable window proposed in the concept drawings; members asked the applicant to consider a rectangular or square window that might be more compatible with the house. The board asked for clearer, folded‑out drawings and photos and asked the applicant to check with the owner about possible changes before resubmitting.
Outcome: The board tabled the item and requested a resubmittal with clarified drawings, decisions on whether narrow shutters will be removed, confirmation of column style and deck under‑closure details, and reconsideration of the octagonal gable window.
Why it matters: The board said the inconsistencies between concept renderings, photographs and construction documents make it difficult to determine what will be built; accurate, legible submissions help avoid construction that conflicts with the home's style and ARB expectations.
What's next: The contractor said he will check with the owner and resubmit revised drawings addressing the board's requested changes. The board offered to review the revised drawings at a future meeting.
