Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Architectural board tables 29 South Maple porch work after concerns over synthetic materials and proportions
Summary
The Architectural Review Board tabled a porch replacement application for 29 South Maple after board members said proposed synthetic materials and altered proportions would not match the house's historic character.
The Architectural Review Board tabled plans for porch repairs and replacements at 29 South Maple after board members said the proposed details and materials would not match the home's historic character.
Contractor John (appearing for the applicant) attended the meeting and heard board members say the porch's brackets, column proportions, lattice pattern and guardrail proportions should match the existing historic detailing. Carol Dunkey, a board member, criticized proposed replacement pieces as "really not in keeping with the quality or the historic nature of the property," noting differences in lattice pattern and column proportions and asking that existing brackets at the top of columns be retained. She warned that the current proposal would make a "very nice historic house ... have a vinyl porch stuck on the outside."
Board member Tracy Collins agreed: "If it can't be vinyl to meet those looks, then think of other materials. Even composite, that's at least scaled appropriately." Members asked the applicant to revise drawings to restore the square‑pattern lattice, retain substantial framing around under‑porch panels, and use railing and column proportions consistent with the existing porch.
Outcome: The board did not vote on the item and tabled the project pending revised drawings. Board members said the applicant and contractor should review the recorded work session comments and submit revised drawings that maintain historic proportions and detailing.
Why it matters: The property is within a historic district and board members said material choices and proportions affect the house's appearance and the district's character. Board members directed the applicant to revise details rather than approve synthetic parts that, in their view, would reduce historic integrity.
What's next: Contractor John said he would review notes and the recorded meeting; the board expects revised plans addressing lattice pattern, bracket retention and railing/column proportions before considering approval.
