Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Active Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Carol Stream hearing on e-bike rules draws split between seniors and younger riders
Summary
Residents and board members debated a village e-bike ordinance at length, with older residents and some trustees urging limits that preserve safety on multiuse paths, while several adult e-bike users and organized riders asked that class 1 pedal‑assist bikes be allowed and that enforcement focus on throttle bikes and reckless riders.
Carol Stream — A long public comment period and subsequent board discussion on electric bicycles led trustees to say they would monitor the new ordinance but consider revisions after hearing competing views from seniors, recreational riders and parents. Mayor Frank Savarino said the village would continue to evaluate enforcement and the ordinance. "Our village manager will look into it," Savarino said.
The debate centered on safety on shared paths, enforcement priorities and impacts on older adults who use pedal‑assist e‑bikes for exercise and mobility. David Carlson, a resident who said he sometimes uses a pedal‑assist e‑bike for exercise, told the board, "As a e‑biker...I would be forced to ride on Gary Avenue instead of the 10‑foot wide bike path. And that would be putting me in [a] dangerous situation." Cindy Carlson, who said she uses pedal assist because of knee injuries, told the board that car crossings were her biggest safety concern and suggested providing protected street bike lanes if riders are required off paths.
Several other residents urged the board to distinguish classes of e‑bikes. "It's really the throttle bikes," Jeff (last name not specified) said, distinguishing pure‑throttle e‑mopeds from class 1 pedal‑assist models. Wendy Yeager said she collected 63 neighborhood signatures asking the village to allow a modified policy that exempts responsible adult class 1 riders; Yeager added, "Banning everybody outright, I don't think is a fair and balanced solution." Trustees repeatedly said the ordinance was new and would be reexamined.
Trustees voiced safety and enforcement concerns. Trustee McCarthy said he had received many complaints from drivers and pedestrians and described high speeds and reckless riding on some devices. Trustee Guthrie and Trustee Anselmo both asked staff to ensure any traffic and enforcement plan addresses school crossings and emergency‑vehicle access.
The board did not take a new vote or repeal the ordinance at the meeting. Instead, multiple trustees and the mayor said staff would continue monitoring compliance and enforcement and return with more information or proposed revisions.
The discussion also included requests for clearer public outreach; trustees encouraged residents to report problem behavior to the police so officers can focus enforcement on dangerous riders rather than on compliant adult pedal‑assist users.
The village attorney and staff will review riders' suggestions — such as permitting class 1 pedal‑assist bikes and banning throttle‑only devices from paths — and report back to the board. No ordinance changes were adopted at this session.
