Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Pahrump landowners push for zoning change, complain of surprise tax increases

August 05, 2025 | Nye County , Nevada


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Pahrump landowners push for zoning change, complain of surprise tax increases
Dozens of Pahrump residents urged Nye County officials Aug. 5 to move quickly on zoning changes and clearer permitting for VR‑zoned lots that many owners say are functionally unusable. Speakers from Calvada Meadows and other subdivisions said they are taxed on lots they cannot develop and asked the county to pursue zoning relief rather than more studies.

“Past the zone change, stop taxing owners while denying them their rights,” said Lorraine Gilbert during the public‑comment period, summarizing the argument heard repeatedly from several residents. Speakers identified the practical problem as lots that lack conventional utility service and therefore cannot be occupied under existing rules; they urged a practical permit or local exceptions so owners can live responsibly off‑grid.

Several speakers also raised separate but related concerns about recent valuation changes for mobile and manufactured homes. Nye County Assessor Sherry Stringer read a prepared explanation from her chief deputy, Justin Zimmerman, saying the taxable value shift reflects a statutorily required change in the valuation multiplier used for manufactured housing. Stringer read the numbers: “The taxable value of your home, fiscal year 24/25 was $97,046. The taxable value for 25/26 is $106,119.” She noted that although values can rise, Nevada caps the annual tax‑liability increase at 3 percent for primary residences.

Commissioners took public comment and discussed options but did not adopt a specific zoning measure during the meeting. Several residents said they can provide technical data on alternative utilities and requested a named county contact for submitting proposals; one caller volunteered to send materials.

Ending: Residents said they will return to future meetings if the county does not move on zoning; commissioners said staff would accept submitted technical materials and the county will continue reviewing possible zoning or permit changes.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee