Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Coos Bay imposes moratorium on new self‑storage construction to protect scarce commercial and industrial land

5736693 · August 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council adopted Resolution 25‑29 placing an immediate moratorium on new self‑storage facility construction while staff studies code changes to prioritize housing and economic development uses on limited commercial/industrial land.

The Coos Bay City Council voted to adopt Resolution 25‑29, imposing an immediate moratorium on the construction of new self‑storage facilities. City staff presented data showing the community already has more than double the typical market supply of rentable storage space given its population and said a moratorium would allow time to amend development code to protect scarce commercial and industrial land for housing and job‑generating uses.

Planning staff told the council that self‑storage is conditionally permitted in most commercial and industrial zones (except mixed‑use and residential zones) and that the city identified 13 existing storage facilities. Using a rule‑of‑thumb saturation metric of approximately 7 square feet of rentable storage per capita, staff estimated Coos Bay’s need at roughly 112,000 square feet; an average facility provides about 46,000 square feet, so the existing inventory already exceeds expected demand.

Council was advised that a moratorium would take effect immediately if adopted and give the city up to a year to prepare code amendments, associated findings, and the required mailed notices under Measure 56 for property owners. The amendments could either restrict storage in certain zones or set new standards to guide where and how storage facilities are allowed. Councilors noted past use of moratoria for single business types — the cannabis business moratorium was cited as precedent — and supported using the pause to draft durable code changes.

Mayor (unnamed) and council members moved and seconded adoption of Resolution 25‑29; the motion passed with no recorded opposition. Staff said there is no special statutory notification required to enact a moratorium but that typical next steps include public hearings before the Planning Commission and mailed notices when the city proposes code amendments.