Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Site Plan Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff reviews snow‑storage and landscaping standards for site plan review; board hears enforcement and maintenance guidance
Summary
Community Development staff reviewed city standards for snow storage and parking‑lot landscaping (Article 9 and Article 21), highlighted key numerical requirements and enforcement practices, and advised board members how to assess alternatives during site‑plan review.
City planning staff delivered a training overview of snow‑storage and landscaping standards that apply during site‑plan review and explained common enforcement and compliance issues. Staff emphasized clear, enforceable plan notes and security requirements to ensure long‑term plant survival and proper snow management.
Mary Brenner explained the snow‑storage standard requires applicants to identify where snow will be stored so that required parking spaces and sensitive areas are not used for snow, and so snow containing salt and sand is not pushed into surface waters or erosion‑prone slopes. Staff said that when a site lacks adequate on‑site storage, they commonly require a plan note that the applicant will haul snow off‑site to an approved facility.
On landscaping, staff reviewed requirements in Article 9 of the Land Development Code and related standards in Article 21. Key numeric standards cited by staff include: an 8‑foot minimum perimeter landscaping depth; one shade tree every 30 feet of perimeter (or two ornamentals substituted for one shade tree); one evergreen shrub every 3 feet (minimum mature height 3 feet); interior parking‑lot landscaping of one tree per 10 parking spaces for lots of 10+ spaces; and a 10% landscaped area requirement for lots of 50+ spaces with more than half in continuous islands at least 8 feet wide. Staff also cited a requirement to provide sufficient soil volume where plantings are installed on formerly paved or compacted surfaces: 300 cubic feet of permeable native soil with an opening at least 3 feet by 6 feet for each tree planting in those circumstances.
Brenner noted the city requires protective fencing around trees to remain during construction, an installation security to guarantee plant survival for one full growing season, and replacement of plants that die within one year. Staff described how minor landscaping revisions are processed by staff when there is no reduction in size or change in general location; larger location changes are typically referred back to the Planning Board. Board members asked about intent (screening, breaking up pavement, stormwater mitigation) and enforcement; staff pointed to Article 9 purpose statements, said intent includes mitigating parking impacts and promoting infiltration and screening where appropriate, and described complaint pathways (department phone, online portal, or in‑person visits).
The session provided board members with clarifying metrics and enforcement points they should use when evaluating alternative landscaping proposals during site‑plan review.
