Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Rates topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council refers proposed water-rate increases to committee after debate over reserves and customer impact
Summary
The Board of Water Commissioners—arlier voted to raise the base quarterly charge and per-unit consumption rate; councilors questioned the need given large water-department reserves and referred the matter to government operations and ordinances for study.
The Laconia City Council on Monday voted to send discussion about proposed water-rate increases to the government operations and ordinances committee after a lengthy exchange between councilors, the water commission chair and city finance staff about reserves, ratepayer impact and authority to set rates.
The Board of Water Commissioners previously voted to change the base rate from $25.00 per quarter to $28.75 per quarter (a 15% increase) and to change the consumption charge from $2.55 to $2.81 per 100 cubic feet (a 10% increase). The rate change would go into effect for bills generated on or after Jan. 1, 2026, and reflect water used on or after Nov. 1, 2025. The water commission estimated roughly $350,000 in additional annual revenue from the change.
Why it matters: Councilors voiced concerns that the water department holds approximately $2.5to3.0 million in reserves (about six months of operating expenses) and questioned whether a rate increase is necessary now. The water commission and finance staff said reserves are held because water operations are capital- and infrastructure-intensive and that failures can require immediate, large expenditures.
Correcting the staff report: a figure in the staff report was clarified during the meeting. The item initially listed the estimated increase for a family of four as "$1.08 per day," but county/city staff and the water commission confirmed that the net increase for an average household is 11 cents per day (about $41 per year), not $1.08 per day. The $350,000 figure is the estimated total additional annual revenue to the water department.
Council debate: Councilor Soucy said he opposed the increase at the water commission meeting because of the department's cash balance and urged a study of whether the council should have final authority over rate approvals. "We have that money in the bank," Soucy said, arguing the council should consider whether rate-setting authority should change. Finance Director Glenn Smith and others noted that water funds differ from general fund reserves because water operations are more capital-intensive and may require immediate use of cash for infrastructure repairs. Smith said auditors have not flagged the reserve level as excessive in recent audits.
Action and next steps: Councilor Cheney moved and the council approved referring the matter to the government operations and ordinances committee for review; the motion passed 6-0. Councilors asked the committee to gather comparative benchmarks for reserve levels and rate-setting practices in similar municipalities and to ask auditors for analysis. No rate change was adopted by the council Monday; the matter remains with the water commission and subject to the committee review and any necessary ordinance process.
Ending: Councilors said they expect the committee to report back with data on reserve benchmarks, audit guidance and recommendations about whether the council should have a greater role in rate approvals.
