At a Clark County Planning Commission briefing, planning staff said an applicant for the Bridal Line site (ET2540064) submitted a drainage study and easement documents and is working with county staff, even as Public Works recommended denial of an extension of time for nonstandard right-of-way improvements.
Why it matters: The Bridal Line application covers a roughly 110-acre property slated for future development. Staff reported they supported an extension of time for a landscape waiver component, while Public Works recommended denial of the requested extension for nonstandard right-of-way improvements; the town board followed the split staff recommendation (approval for landscaping waiver, denial for nonstandard right-of-way improvements). The applicant has submitted a drainage study and easement documentation and is continuing to coordinate with staff, according to the record.
Details: Planning staff described two components to the extension request: a landscape-waiver extension (which planning staff recommended for approval) and a request for an extension to allow work on nonstandard improvements in the county right of way (which Public Works recommended denying). Staff said the applicant completed and submitted the drainage study and easement documents and is “working with staff.” Staff reported two public-support cards were filed on the item. The transcript records a staff speaker saying, “Since the staff report has came out, they have been working with staff and they have, completed their drainage study and submitted documents for the easements for the drainage.”
Discussion at the briefing remained procedural; no formal action was taken at the briefing itself. The planning commission chair confirmed the staff update and noted the commission wants the project to proceed toward eventual development if the applicant satisfies outstanding requirements.
Next steps: Staff will include the drainage and easement submissions in the project file and proceed with the public hearing process. The Public Works recommendation to deny the extension for nonstandard right-of-way improvements remains in the record and will be considered along with other public comments and staff analyses at hearing.