Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Personnel Compensation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Select Board Tables Cost-of-Living Adjustment Policy After Lengthy Debate

5733842 · September 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members and residents debated two competing COLA proposals at length Sept. 2, then voted to table the matter until a future meeting after further consideration and with a potentially full board.

The Brentwood Select Board on Sept. 2 debated two proposals for an annual cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) for town employees and ultimately voted to table the issue for a later meeting. Nut graf: One proposal would tie an annual increase to the federal Social Security COLA; an alternative proposed by a board member capped the COLA at 2.5% (later discussed at 4%) and added language reserving the board—s right not to provide the COLA in constrained budget years. After extended discussion among board members and about a dozen members of the public, the motion to table the COLA was passed. Select Board members discussed the merits of a policy that would promise annual COLAs indexed to the federal Social Security increase versus language that limited (capped) automatic increases to protect the town under the 4% tax cap. Board members and public commenters stressed competing priorities: supporting municipal employees, maintaining budget discipline under the tax cap, and the practicality of setting long-term promises that could bind future boards. Several residents spoke during public comment, urging the board either not to cap COLAs or to put the matter on the warrant for a town vote. After public comment and board discussion, a board member moved to table the COLA proposal; the motion passed on a voice vote. Ending: The Select Board tabled the COLA proposals pending further consideration and possible future revision; no policy was adopted at the Sept. 2 meeting.