Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Complaints And Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press council on dilapidated properties, drainage and a pending death investigation; council arranges follow-up
Summary
Several residents raised long-running concerns about dilapidated properties, drainage and potholes; family members asked for information about a death investigation and the council asked the police chief and city attorney to meet with the family.
Get email alerts on the Community Complaints And Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
During the public-comment period at the June 17 Gautier City Council meeting multiple residents raised concerns about dilapidated properties, drainage and potholes, and family members publicly requested more information and closure on an active death investigation.
Resident Gerald Barlow asked the council what had been done regarding a dilapidated property near his shop and said he did not understand why city staff could not examine the property. The mayor and staff explained that while staff can photograph property from public rights-of-way, staff cannot legally enter private property without permission; using third-party photos in court requires affidavits. Barlow also asked about a sunken driveway; Public Works staff were asked to follow up.
Jerry Fortenberry and Kevin Smith raised additional neighborhood maintenance and code-enforcement concerns, including uncollected debris and potholes at Townsend Road and Carmel. Meeting staff and department heads told residents staff would follow up after the meeting and that photos taken from public locations could be submitted with affidavits if needed for enforcement actions.
Several family members spoke about a young person’s death and expressed frustration with investigative progress and the communication they were receiving. Family members asked for more evidence and follow-up; the mayor said she had requested the police chief and the city attorney contact the family and schedule a meeting to discuss the investigation. Police Chief Bevers (present in the meeting) confirmed staff would reach out and that investigators were continuing work; the mayor encouraged the family to meet with the chief and city attorney for detailed discussion.
The council did not take binding policy action on these public comments during the meeting beyond directing staff to follow up and arranging a meeting between the family and law-enforcement staff. Specific enforcement steps, timelines for abatement or outcomes of any future enforcement or investigatory meetings were not recorded in the transcript.

