A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Council OKs memorandum of understanding to support Tri City Dealer request for mid‑block crossing on Route 108

September 02, 2025 | Somersworth City Council, Somersworth City , Strafford County, New Hampshire


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Council OKs memorandum of understanding to support Tri City Dealer request for mid‑block crossing on Route 108
The Somersworth City Council voted on Sept. 2 to authorize the city manager to enter into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Tri City CDJR (192 Route 108) and to submit an application to the New Hampshire Department of Transportation for a mid‑block crossing and related pedestrian infrastructure at that location.
City Manager outlined the key conditions the Traffic Safety Committee had suggested and which the council endorsed: (1) Tri City will bear all costs for the application, design, permits and construction; (2) Tri City will maintain the infrastructure (including snow removal and routine upkeep) and grant a performance bond in favor of the city for repair/maintenance obligations; (3) the city manager may decline to submit an application if state conditions or liabilities are inconsistent with the MOU; and (4) any site-plan amendments required are the responsibility of the project proponent.
Councilor Vincent moved to authorize the manager to move forward with the MOU and application; the motion was seconded and passed on a roll-call vote with Councilor Gibson recorded as voting no and the remaining councilors voting yes (recorded roll call: Vincent yes; Gibson no; Harry Catanzaro yes; Michaud yes; Witham yes; Goodwin yes; Cameron yes; Pepin yes).
The manager cautioned that a state mid‑block crossing on Route 108 could require more than a painted crosswalk — potentially flashing beacons, pedestrian refuges or other devices — and that the state’s Complete Streets planning for Route 108 will influence near‑term and long‑term requirements. He said the city expects the proponent’s obligations to persist until such time as the city or state assumes responsibility through future corridor work. The council majority characterized the arrangement as business‑friendly and low risk because the private proponent will fund and maintain the improvement; at least one councilor expressed concern about eventual municipal liability if and when the city accepted full corridor infrastructure in the future.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New Hampshire articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI