Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the General Assistance Welfare topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves $10,000 transfer after spike in general‑assistance cases, citing costs tied to care of wards of the state
Summary
The council authorized a $10,000 transfer into the general assistance budget after staff reported an unusual number of requests for cremation and funeral costs for residents deemed wards of the state; officials said these cases and higher rent/utilities drove the overrun.
Town Manager Rick Sawyer told the Bedford Town Council on June 25 that the town had exceeded its general assistance budget midway through the fiscal year because of an unusual cluster of cases requiring funeral/cremation assistance and rising costs for rent and utilities.
Pam Hogan, who administers local welfare, explained the main driver: several deceased individuals who had been placed in for‑profit nursing homes were identified as wards of the state and lacked funds for cremation. Hogan said the town is responsible for proper disposition under RSA 165. She described recent changes in residency rules and noted some cases required research to identify possible family members or responsible parties; in several instances funeral homes agreed to compassion discounts, and some pending Social Security reconciliations changed whether the town ultimately paid.
Hogan said the standard local practice for indigent cremation has been about $1,100 for a simple cremation; she said the town cannot be required to provide a full burial but does seek the least‑cost, proper disposition. Councilors asked about caps and liens; staff said towns cannot set a per‑person cap for assistance under state welfare rules and that the town can, and has, placed welfare liens in cases where recoverable assets later became available.
Councilor Bill Carter moved to transfer $10,000 from the town council’s unallocated reserve account to the general assistance account to cover additional claimant costs in 2025. Councilor Kathleen Bemis seconded. The motion passed unanimously, 7–0.
Councilors and staff said they expect these cases to recur as a demographic phenomenon: improved life expectancy for people with developmental disabilities and increases in the number of wards of the state mean municipalities may see more end‑of‑life costs for individuals with no family resources. Staff will continue to track cases and use existing processes (searching for responsible family, notifying vendors) before funding assistance.
