Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Branding And Public Realm topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council sends proposed parkway banners back to committee after design review and budget check
Summary
Councilmembers voted to return a $31,050 street-pole banner program to committee for additional brand review and refinements after staff and committee input; the full council voted 8-0 to send the proposal back for further consideration.
Get email alerts on the Branding And Public Realm topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Councilmembers voted unanimously to send a proposed parkway street-pole banner program back to committee for additional branding review and refinements. The parks committee had reviewed a design set that staff said had been developed with input from several city departments; the packet showed a budgeted amount of about $31,050 for the banners.
Parks Committee chairperson Mastroakis opened discussion noting that staff and a team representing multiple departments had developed proposed banners to reflect community character; staff said $31,050 had been budgeted for the item. Council member McGinnis moved to send the banner designs back to committee for further brand review and revision; the amendment was seconded and carried on a voice vote, 8-0.
Council members said staff had done a strong initial job but that the banners are a visible, long-term branding element and merited another review pass before production and installation. The amendment directs the relevant committee to return with refined design options for council consideration.
Why this matters: The banners will be installed along a visible parkway and have been budgeted; council members wanted to ensure font, color and photo choices match the city's broader brand identity before the city proceeds to production and installation.
What happens next: The item returns to committee; staff and the committee will prepare revised banner options for a future council meeting.
Sources and attribution: Discussion and votes taken from the city council meeting transcript.

