Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation Fees topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Advisory board urges Lawrence commission to keep indoor recreation admission free, passes recommendation 4-3

5719784 · August 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After hours of debate about a proposed $1.8 million departmental budget shortfall and new membership fees, the Parks, Recreation and Culture Advisory Board voted 4-3 to recommend the City Commission keep indoor recreation center admission free for self-directed exercise and recreation.

The Parks, Recreation and Culture Advisory Board voted 4-3 on Monday to recommend the Lawrence City Commission maintain a policy of free admission to indoor recreation centers for self-directed exercise and recreation.

Board members said the recommendation responds to extensive public opposition to proposed admission and membership fees while highlighting trade-offs between new revenue and cuts to services. "The Parks, Recreation and Culture Advisory Board recommends that you maintain the policy of keeping indoor recreation center admissions free for self-directed exercise and recreation," Board member Marilyn Hall read as the motion on the floor.

The vote came after staff presented revised membership-fee scenarios and told the board that revisions the commission requested could reduce projected membership revenue by roughly $50,000 compared with earlier estimates. "By including free access for youth and for households that qualify for the reduced rate, we're looking at potentially a $50,000 reduction in the revenue that we were projecting," Parks and Recreation staff member Luis said during the presentation.

Why it matters: The department is working against a larger $1.8 million target of budget reductions. Board members repeatedly framed the choice as a trade-off: raise fees to preserve services or hold admissions free and accept deeper cuts in maintenance, part-time staffing and program availability. Board members cited likely consequences including less-frequent mowing, delayed equipment repairs and fewer seasonal staff hours.

What staff proposed and what changed: Staff presented earlier membership proposals that included higher adult monthly and annual options and a qualified reduced rate for low-income households. Following commission feedback, staff said they are developing a simplified structure with lower universal rates in some scenarios and a separate approach that makes anyone 17 and under free and makes the qualified (low-income) rate free. Staff also told the board the commission gave feedback on whether resident rates should be limited to City of Lawrence residents or extended to Douglas County; staff said commissioners supplied mixed guidance.

Board concerns and debate: Several members opposed fees as a permanent response to a short-term citywide budget gap, saying fees can shift costs to other programs or raise other fees for participants. One member warned that giving some services away without replacing revenue forces either service reductions or fee increases elsewhere: "If you give something away here for nothing, then something over here has to increase or we have to reduce services," a board member said during discussion. Other board members urged the advisory board to forward a clear, direct recommendation reflecting public comments received.

Action and next steps: The board approved the recommendation by roll call (John Nabandian — No; Lee Ice — No; Vicky Colley Acres — Yes; Taylor Bussinger — Yes; Marilyn Hall — Yes; Ruth DeWitt — No; Lisa Hallberg — Yes). Staff said the finalized recommendation will be transmitted to the City Clerk for placement on the City Commission agenda; staff also said revised budget figures will accompany the proposed budget at the commission's budget presentation scheduled for September 2 and that the commission's final budget approval is scheduled for September 16.

What the recommendation does not decide: The advisory board's vote is a formal recommendation, not an instruction that changes department operations. Board members emphasized they do not direct city staff or the commission and that the commission retains final authority over fees, expenditures and the final budget.

The board asked staff to forward the motion text and supporting rationale to the commission and to continue work on operational details — notably how to implement income-qualified free access without creating burdensome documentation requirements for residents.