Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Committee weighs proposed probate rule to allow immediate appeals of some court orders

July 24, 2025 | Judicial Rules, Joint, Committees, Legislative , Vermont


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee weighs proposed probate rule to allow immediate appeals of some court orders
The Legislative Committee on Judicial Rules examined a proposed amendment to probate procedures (BRPP54A) that would identify specific probate and guardianship orders that may be appealed immediately rather than waiting until final disposition.
Joanne Ortell, presenting the proposal, said the amendment responds to instances where an interlocutory decision — for example, allowance to sell real estate — could be irreversible and therefore merits an immediate right of appeal. “If someone was upset by decision to sell real estate, they need to have the right to appeal immediately,” Ortell said.
Supporters told the committee the change would clarify when appeals are available; opponents — including two trial court judges who submitted comments — warned the amendment could encourage earlier appeals and thereby delay proceedings. As Ortell summarized, some judges “liked the idea, but they had concerns about whether it was premature to allow people to appeal. It would slow down the proceedings.”
Committee members proposed narrowing appeal windows to limit delay. Representative Allison (first name not specified in transcript) asked whether a “very tight window,” such as 30 days, could be required; Ortell said the normal 30-day appeal period likely applies and that she would “bring that to the committee’s attention for discussion in September.”
The committee did not vote to promulgate the rule at this meeting; Ortell said the Evidence/Rules committee will consider the matter again at its next rules meeting in September and that the Supreme Court has not yet been asked to promulgate BRPP54A.
Members emphasized the balance between clarifying litigants’ rights and avoiding procedural fragmentation. As Ortell put it: “People need to know what their rights are,” but others cautioned that creating appeal triggers could increase appeals and delay estate and guardianship matters.
The committee will revisit the proposed rule at its next rules meeting and may solicit language tightening appeal deadlines before deciding whether to recommend promulgation to the Supreme Court.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee