Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Committee chair and staff outline scoring system, deadlines and consultant review for proposal shortlist

5714788 · August 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff and Committee chair explained the Bonfire scoring system, a requirement to include a short justification for extreme scores, consultant (HVS) separate scoring, and the schedule for committee scoring and future meetings to narrow the field.

Jim Gilmore, city staff, briefed the committee on the scoring process and the online Bonfire system the committee will use to rate the nine proposals. He said each committee member must enter scores into Bonfire and that the system requires a short justification when members enter particularly low or high scores. "When you do do the scoring, the way the system works, they it asks you for a reason why you pick 0 or why you pick 5," Gilmore said, and he recommended typing a brief justification for outlying scores to aid later review.

Gilmore and Mayor…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans