A committee member proposed exploring a joint community-based education effort between the Human Relations Committee and the North Dakota Human Rights Coalition to teach public-speaking and civic-engagement skills and basic human and civil rights concepts.

Members reacted positively to the idea of community skills-building but raised concerns about public perception and the risk of confusion between the committee (a city advisory body) and the state-level coalition. One member noted that the coalition's broader affiliations can cause misunderstanding among residents and suggested caution.

Committee members recommended an initial, focused conversation among the committee chair, vice chair and Doug (city administrator) to clarify the legal and reputational implications of any formal association. The committee asked staff to check with city administration about whether the committee can partner publicly with the coalition and, if so, what an appropriate, neutral joint program would look like.

No formal partnership or agreement was authorized at the meeting. The committee requested that city staff report back by the next meeting with guidance on: whether a city committee may co-sponsor or co-brand events with the coalition, recommended guardrails to avoid perceived endorsement of political positions, and potential administrative steps required to host joint education sessions.

The committee emphasized that its stated aim is nonpartisan civic education to help residents communicate with local government and build community leadership. Members asked for clear city guidance before approaching the coalition further.