Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Component Units Audits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Auditors tell Grand County that late component‑unit audits delayed 2024 report; committee urged earlier deadlines
Summary
Auditors told the committee late or missing audits for discrete component units (EMS, water service district, transportation) prolonged the 2024 audit; the committee directed staff and component units to deliver audited reports earlier—ideally by May—to prevent future delays.
Grand County's audit of fiscal year 2024 was delayed in part because several discrete component units did not supply audited financial statements and audit reports in time for the county's consolidated report, the county's external auditor told the Audit Committee on Aug. 18.
Lead auditor John Hatterley told the committee that the county relies on component units' audited reports when their financial activity represents a material portion of the county's consolidated totals. "We have to get their audit reports from their auditors," Hatterley said, noting that around $37 million in assets resided in component units and that missing or late reports prevented the county from finalizing its consolidated opinion sooner.
Committee members discussed possible next steps: setting earlier internal deadlines, having component units produce their financials by May, and formalizing expectations in writing. Julian Metcalfe of GPP Analytics told the committee the problem often becomes an "expectation" issue, where component units and their auditors have historically scheduled field work late in the year. The committee asked county management to work with component units and their auditors to set clearer deadlines so the county can prepare and issue audited financial statements earlier.
Why it matters: component units' financials are included in the county's consolidated financial statements. When component auditors do not provide timely audit reports, the county must either wait or issue opinions with separate scope qualifications for the component unit columns, complicating filing and potentially affecting grant and bond reviews.
Details and recommended changes: auditors recommended establishing written expectations, earlier field work (March–April rather than May–June), and more direct communication between county staff and component‑unit auditors to confirm schedules and peer‑review status. Committee members asked county staff to present a proposed component‑unit deadline schedule for approval at a future meeting.
Ending: county officials said they will pursue a May target for component‑unit submissions and will return with a schedule and options for supporting component units' timely completion of audits.
